Bolton Wanderers fans should be seen and not heard
Wednesday September 23rd, 2009
Gary Megson’s supporters in the media are totally missing the point
Something’s been puzzling me for a while. Why are the media so keen to criticise Bolton fans for our treatment of Gary Megson?
In some of my previous posts I’ve suggested that it’s caused by people who have no emotional (and therefore irrational) attachment to the club finding it impossible to fully understand how Megson has undermined the spirit that has been slowly built over the last 15-20 years.
But after reading some of the reports of the latest Megson hate-in, against Stoke at the Reebok on Saturday, I’ve come up with another theory.
The Independent’s match report trotted out the usual line about Megson deserving more credit than he gets from Bolton fans, despite also saying it was a ‘dismal display’ by the Whites in the very same report.
The Bolton News described the Wanderers performance as ‘awful’, and yet still managed to blame the fans for going on a ‘witch hunt‘.
Amidst all this are the usual arguments about him keeping us up in his first season despite selling Nicolas Anelka (we’d finished 7th a year earlier), keeping us up last season (only because there were so many blody awful teams below us) and picking up four points from the last two games (against the mighty Portsmouth and Stoke). There was a good example of this on 5 Live’s 606 phone-in, according to this discussion on Burnden Aces.
The worst offender was this ridiculously over-simplisitic view given by a non-Bolton fan in the Mirror a couple of weeks ago (rightly taken to task by Vital Bolton Wanderers), which was completely undermined by the author making reference to Megson as ‘the man you once hailed as Ginger Mourinho’ (memo to outsiders: the whole Ginger Mourinho thing was never affectionate, it was always a piss-take).
The implication in all these articles is that Bolton Wanderers and its fans should not have any ambition. We should be happy to be swimming along with our heads just above the water, because that’s exactly where we deserve to be.
Well, ask yourself this, how do you think Bolton Wanderers got in to the Premier League and then Europe in the first place? Was it by having a manager who just threw his hands up and said, ‘oh well, we’re only little old Bolton, we’ve got no chance of surviving in the Premier League so why even bother trying’? No, it was by having a manger who believed that simply plodding along and accepting your place isn’t good enough.
The only way Bolton managed to eascape an existence that involved regular trips to Scunthorpe and Torquay and playing our home games at a ground with a supermarket at one end, was by believing that we deserved better; that bog standard was not good enough.
Has Gary Megson done a terrible job? No, but simply ‘not doing a terrible job’ is not good enough. I want a manager who does an outstanding job. It’s by demanding such high standards that we got where we are in the first place.
If you accept the inevitability if mediocrity, then mediocrity is all you will get.
Your views welcome in the comments below…
Share this on Facebook or Twitter:
5 Comments to Bolton Wanderers fans should be seen and not heard
The way I see it, the fans have made it clear that they want to see a little adventure in Bolton’s play. At the Stoke game, the team was intent at playing long-ball from the start, looking for Davies, Taylor and Steinsson (none of them the tallest) to beat the 4 towering Stoke centre-backs in the air. It took 45 minutes and an anxious crowd before anything changed (we had one notable chance on goal that half – Cahill heading over from another set-piece).
There’s two much negativity in the tactics. The opening day saw McCann start on the right-wing – meaning Kieran Richardson could push forward a little more content that the defence can handle any threat posed down that wing. Playing 4-5-1 at home to Stoke with 2 forwards on the bench, a right-back on the right-wing and 2 of the 3 central midfielders being defensively minded sends across the wrong message.
As soon as the team manage to keep the ball on the ground, move for each other and work the ball up the field from some inventive play the crowd respond to it. I believe with Mark Davies, Cohen, Taylor, Gardner and new recruit Lee we have the youth, energy and eagerness to try and play some good football. I believe this squad is just as capable of playing football as the Bolton team at its peak in the BSA era. McCann gets the ball and assuming he has some space (otherwise he plays it backward or loses it, as he doesn’t have the dexterity to shield a ball and make space for himself) he looks for the long ball to someone’s head. At least Campo would be inventive enough to try and catch out the sleeping centre-back.
So, in my book (and I’m all for Megson staying if he manages to pull it off) Megson should study the positives over the last couple of weeks and choose the best team capable of achieving all the good things Megson talks of in post-match interviews. If he gambles a little more his squad might just react to the inevitable positive crowd reaction the team will receive. If he sticks with it, crowds may just increase, sponsors will be happier, there will be less anxiety in the dressing room and the chairman can be happy. Most fans are man enough to stomach a defeat if the team at least attempts to win in a positive manner – the Liverpool game should prove this (although this is more of the shift the players put in against better opponents).
The way I see it Megson can’t afford to not gamble on playing a little more adventurous. If Bolton continue to play dross and show little invention, the crowds will stay away and stay hostile, the players will continue to suffer, and Megson will eventually be out of a job.
September 23, 2009
When dear old Sam decided to leave, not only Sam left but the back room staff as well. The remit for Megson was to stabilise the club, rebuild the back room staff, reduce the average age of the playing staff and finally keep the club in the Premier League. The conclusion being that he has achieved the objectives. Yes you can say that the performances have not been pretty, but then West Brom play pretty football and where are they?
Given that the Club now has good foundations to build on the average punter has to take the view over the next two years before passing judgement on the success of Megson.
September 23, 2009
True the club needed rebuilding, however scraping around the bottom, taking 1 point off the top seven sides last season (a poor Aston Villa side on a run of many losses ended by drawing with us)is hardly inspiring fayre after numerous successive top half finishes.
Fulham also scraped up on th last day of megson’s 1st season with us and they pushed on, qualifying for Europe the next season.
The difference being that they have a much better manager.
September 23, 2009
The reported fightback v West Ham shows promise of the kind of spirit that may attract back stay-away fans like myself. Was the play better than recent matches ?? I didn’t see it.
I am so tired of being told by strangers that we are not Real Madrid. I’m pretty sure all Wanderers fans are aware they we aren’t Real fucking Madrid and that kind of condescension is completely missing what our actual issues with Gary Megson are. The media crucifying all Wanderers fans is really starting to get to me.








September 23, 2009