Time to ‘get real’ about Bolton Wanderers. Here goes…

Wednesday January 13th, 2010

Keeping it real, unless youre a journalist of course (via nimish gogri)

Keeping it real, unless you're a journalist of course (via nimish gogri)

Football fans will ‘get real’ when journalists do too…

Disliking Bolton Wanderers has become default mode for most journalists and pundits these days. Their main problems with us are that we bullied Gary Megson out of a job and have ideas above our station when it comes to what we think our team should be capable of.

The first point has been covered at length on this site, but I will just link to a comment I left on this article, which repeated the misleading argument that results had nothing to do with Megson’s sacking. I added a bit of realism.

On the second, am I the only person who finds it incredibly ironic that Sky and the  newspapers, who have spent the last 15 years hyping the ‘promise land’ of the Premier League, are now telling us that we should ‘get real’?

When Sky start running adverts along the lines of “you’re welcome to watch Arsenal v Manchester United this weekend on Sky Sports. It will probably be really dull, with both teams cancelling each other out and not really trying to win the game, but we’ll do our best to make it interesting for you” instead of the usual “Super Sunday” and “clash of the century” bollocks, maybe then football fans will have some realism too.

Another irony is those in the media insisting we get real when they place such little value on realism in their own work. It’s not just Bolton either. When Roberto Mancini took over Mark Hughes’ job at Man City, Lee Dixon, a (probably) very well-paid (with your license fee) pundit was allowed to say (unchallenged) on Match of the Day that Mancini had not achieved anything more than Hughes in the game. How about a bit of realism, Lee? How about the three Serie A league titles that Mancini has won, Lee? How about the two Italian Cups and the fact he’s managed in the Champions League, Lee?

Another piece of journalism lacking realism was this piece in the Irish Independent about Owen Coyle’s appointment as Megson’s replacement. This line in particular got me:

Having scored 23 goals in 78 appearances for Bolton under Bruce Rioch between 1993 and 1995, Coyle’s recent billing as a club legend suggests a touch of revisionism at the Reebok.

Unlike most 21st century websites, the Irish Independent do not allow readers the privilege of correcting their mistakes via some kind of commenting system, so instead I had to write an email to the ‘letters to the editor’ section (what is this, 1999?). Here’s what I wrote:

This is a classic case of a journalist looking at facts and figures and failing to put them in any kind of context. Coyle’s importance to Bolton fans is not based on the number of goals he scored but on the importance of the ones he did. He was by no means prolific, in fact he was often a nervous finisher in front of goal, but somehow he had a knack for scoring goals in very important games, most notably in FA Cup ties against Everton and Arsenal in 1994.

These days, Bolton beating Everton and Arsenal in FA Cup ties may not seem that significant, but at the time we were a lower league team with fresh memories of being in Division Four only six years earlier. Furthermore, these FA Cup victories were symbolic of the rebirth of Bolton Wanderers from the doldrums of the 80s.

The mid-90s, when Bruce Rioch led us back to the top flight with two promotions in three years are remembered extremely fondly by all Bolton fans, not least because of the style with which these promotions were achieved. Pretty much every player who played during that period is considered to be something of a ‘legend’, regardless of the number of games played or goals scored.

Therefore there is no revisionism at the Reebok. The national media may have forgotten about Coyle’s association with Bolton in the intervening 16 years, but Bolton fans never did.

I trust you will publish this letter on your website so all your readers can have access to the full facts.

Watch this space to see if the Irish Independent ‘get real’.

Leave your views below. This isn’t the Irish Independent, so what you waiting for?

Share this on Facebook or Twitter: bookmark bookmark

BWFC News, Gary Megson, Owen Coyle

Tags: , , , , , , ,

BWFC Forum

7 Comments to Time to ‘get real’ about Bolton Wanderers. Here goes…

Mike
January 13, 2010

I thought that was an excellent article and you’re spot on when when you mention realism, however I think it actually goes back to when West Ham was relegated instead of us, I remember the headlines at the time, saying it would be a travesty for the Premiership and for football if the Hammers went down and we stayed up…! The rest is history!

Manny Road
January 13, 2010

Cheers Mike.

I think you’re partly right about the West Ham thing, the other thing is that the press basically have a set number of narratives to attach to football clubs, and basically they’ve run out of narratives (or ways of making us seem interesting) for us so all they’re left with is bashing us.

One of those narratives is the plucky little club that’s just been promoted and is doing pretty well. The current darlings of this are Stoke and Burnley.

As soon as you stay too long though, or get ideas above your station (getting in to Europe) then they knock you down again.

In a nutshell, the press are bored of us and they wish we’d go away, mainly because most of them can’t be bothered to do any real research in to what’s going on, so they just re-hash each other’s arguments and ideas. It’s just churn, and ultimately it will be the death of most newspapers because most people aren’t interested in reading that crap.

Robert Walsh
January 14, 2010

Most of the muppets on the various TV sports channels are commentators and not journalists. They have no recognised qualification for their position. That said the copy produced by sports journalist regarding Bolton beggars belief. The latest being Owen Coyle, side way move, over achievers etc. Most lack basic research and an objective approach to their copy. Given the financial problems at Man U, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal, perhaps a move to a financially stable well run club is a step up for Owen!

Matilda
January 25, 2010

I find that it’s not just the media that rely on outdated stereotypes and falsities to say anything about teams like Bolton, it’s fans too. This was typified for me by comments on an article I wrote about the Arsenal-Bolton game ( http://bolton.theoffside.com/results/arsenal-4-2-bolton-or-so-thats-why-they-call-them-the-gunners.html ) and an Arsenal-written article I found on the Bolton-Arsenal game the title of which was “Gunners outclass Bolton Thugs” or some such nonsense.

Bolton is not a dirty team and haven’t been for a while. People are still calling this a team constructed by Big Sam, when in reality the only players around from his days are Jaaskelainen, Super Kev, and Muamba. People want to see a thuggish, dirty Bolton because that’s more exciting than admitting they can actually play football.

Matilda
January 25, 2010

I found the article I referred to above. http://arsenal-mania.com/articles/3107965/Arsenal-class-prevails-against-Bolton-thugs.html
The writer clearly relied on old stereotypes and media spin to write it and it is mostly rubbish. Also brilliant photo to go with the article, made me laugh out loud

Manny Road
January 25, 2010

I wouldn’t worry too much about Arsenal fans, Matilda. They’ve developed this sort of moral superiority in recent years to replace the actual superiority they used to get from winning trophies. Basically, they’ve convinced themselves that despite not winning anything for years, they’re still better than anyone else because they play much better football. It allows them to blame others (ie the Bolton thugs) for their own failings, ie their lack of fighting spirit in the heat of battle (as demonstrated yet again at Stoke yesterday). It’s similar to Newcastle in a way. They used the ‘our fans are so much more loyal than everyone else’s’ liner for years and it allowed them to ignore facing up to the real cause of their problems. I guess what I’m saying is that I thoroughly respect Arsenal for the quality of their football, their were monents in both the recent games where you just have to stand back, admire and say ‘that’s too good for us to live with’. But just because they’re good doesn’t mean they have a God-given right for other teams to just stand back and watch them play. If anything, their quality makes it even more likely that teams will try and rough them up. They need to deal with that, it is a man’s game after all. Until they do they will continue to fall short of what they’re potentially capable of in terms of winning trophies.

Manny Road
January 25, 2010

Two after-thoughts to my previous comment:

1. I meant there, not their

2. My criticism of Arsenal may just seem like jealousy or bitterness from someone who supports a team who have had a slightly difficult relationship with Arsenal in recent years, mainly because our styles of play have been such polar opposites of late. But I’d like to go on record and say that I’ve always quite liked Arsenal (partly because they’re not Man U, Liverpool or Chelsea) and partly because I grew up in a time when Bolton were not a Premier League club (so it was OK to have a Prem team as your second favourite). In fact I’d love Arsenal to grow some balls and go on to win the league this year. So it ain’t bitterness, I promise you…

Leave a comment

BWFC Forum

Latest BWFC News

Manny Road Archive

Select a Wanderer

Search Manny Road